|
The
Remodeling of Benazir Bhutto into a Saint
Syndicated
by Reuters on their International News Website on US News
Blog Posts [Image]
By
Shelomo Alfassa / December 29, 2007
While
the assassination of Benazir
Bhutto was tragic, history remembers who this woman
was--and she was--no Mother Teresa. Recent media coverage
of Benazir's assassination in Pakistan has become another
media circus. Benazir is being made to look like a saint,
a poor little victim, and a sad woman who was a rising star
in Pakistan, the wild west of the Islamic world. While politicians
and media personalities continue to call for a "democracy"
in Pakistan, and as they desire to get rid of Pervez Musharraf
the current President of Pakistan, and former Chief of Staff
of the Pakistan Army, they must be blind to the fact that
it is he and his military that are holding the Islamic terrorists
at bay with an iron fist.
Benazir
would not have made a good leader, she demonstrated this
on more than one occasion over past decades, her days as
a leader were long over. Her first bout with trouble may
have been thirty years ago, when in 1977 at Karachi International
Airport, police officers lifted the veils of the incoming
passengers searching for Benazir Bhutto who had been in
London and whom they had learned might have been coming
to Pakistan to disrupt elections. Benazir was twice elected
prime minister of Pakistan, 1988-1990 and 1993-1996, and
twice expelled from office because of a slew of corruption
charges. In 1991, one year after she lost her Prime Ministership,
she suffered a setback when Pakistani terrorists loyal to
her, armed with knives and hand grenades, hijacked a Singapore
Airlines flight, doused passengers with alcohol and began
a countdown to start killing them; they were later killed
by the police.
Her
primary problem was that while in office, she asserted her
authority without sufficiently understanding her own Constitution
or how her own military functioned. A 1996 scholarly paper
in the University of California's Asian Survey records
that a botched 1990 operation to stop terrorists who were
stockpiling weapons, resulted in 30 persons being killed
and a reaction in the city of Karachi resulted in another
350 dying. The situation was complicated because then Prime
Minister Benazir had acted without involving the top military
brass. Once the situation was finally resolved, the lead
General who arrived on scene was met with slogans of "impose
martial law, remove Benazir Bhutto." The same paper
records that Benazir was "not very effective or skillful
in managing relations with the army," and that her
"her poor comprehension of the workings of the military"
were a source of continuing problems.
The
end of her second role as Prime Minister came in 1996 when
Farooq Leghari, the president of Pakistan, telephoned Bhutto
to let her know she was fired; he claimed her government
had been dishonest. It was reported that in the city of
Karachi, women handed out sweets and men danced in the streets
over her ouster. The Economist said in 1996, "Miss
Bhutto's political problems are largely self-inflicted.
She antagonized the judiciary last year, when she appointed
many ill-qualified judges-some of them party loyalists."
A 1997
New York Times article reported that Pakistanis saw,
"Ms. Bhutto's Government as one of the most corrupt
in Pakistan's nearly 50-year history," and reported
that investigators said that "Bhutto Government officials
looted billions of dollars from public funds." It has
been alleged by government sources from various countries
that Ms. Bhutto and her husband had been conducting themselves
in a corrupt manner. This includes the Polish government
who in 1997 alleged she and her husband accepted millions
in kickbacks from the sale of equipment; a 1998 French deal
which involved a the sale of military fighter aircraft;
and suspicious deposits in Dubai, where millions of dollars
were said to have stemmed from questionable or illegal kickbacks
from gold dealers.
In
1998, Swiss authorities located more than $10 million dollars
in bank accounts belonging to Bhutto and her family. One
year later, a government prosecutor in Switzerland provided
150 pages of evidence to the Pakistan government demonstrating
corruption and kickbacks which included the purchase of
a $188,000 diamond necklace for Ms. Bhutto. She was later
convicted (along with her husband), and sentenced to five
years in prison, as well as fined $8.6 million dollars for
taking these kickbacks while in office. From 2004 until
the day of her death, Swiss government officials had been
conducting the investigation into allegations that she had
used Swiss banks to launder millions of dollars in kickbacks.
A 1998 New York Times article reported, "Pakistani
investigators insist that some $500 million has been uncovered
in 19 Swiss bank accounts. The proceeds, they say, are from
Ms. Bhutto's cuts on Government contracts and drug deals."
Even
while government investigators demonstrated that Benazir
was filling her pockets with illegally obtained money, a
1998 article in The Economist spoke about how she
would continue to travel the world seeking funds for her
poor country, and that she was, "an accomplished beggar."
Economic Review magazine reported that in 1999, the
government of Benazir Bhutto, "in it's own pursuit,"
had mounted campaigns to recover hundreds of billion of
dollars in defaulted loans, "mainly for propaganda
and publicity purposes." Prof. Robert LaPorte Jr.,
Professor of Political Science at The Pennsylvania State
University wrote in 1997, that "the Bhutto government
had succeeded in alienating the business community, the
judiciary, the military, the president, the international
assistance community (the World Bank and the International
Monetary Fund in particular), and given the lack of protests
against the dismissal, the Pakistani public-at-large."
It
is bizarre to see the world media speaking of the successive
"tragedies" that the Bhutto family has experienced.
Her father, Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, a former Pakistani Prime
Minister, was executed by the government in 1979, not assassinated
as has been reported on the cable news channels. And her
brother, Murtaza Bhutto, who was killed in 1996, was not
a supporter of his sister Benazir--as a matter of fact,
her brother had been a long time political opponent of her's,
and he persistently accused her of operating a government
culture based on extensive corruption.
Yet,
corruption is not the worst problem in Pakistan, Islamic
fundamentalism is. Pakistan remains a breeding ground for
jihadists, and according to a CNN poll (Dec. 2007), 46%
of Pakistanis approve of Osama bin Laden. Yes, the military
is not as strong as they should be, and yes, Musharraf may
not be the finest leader, however--it is the government
of Musharraf and the existing Pakistani military which is
the only body able to hold off the Taliban and the terrorist
forces of Al-Quaeda from taking control of the floundering
country. The pampered wealthy Benazir was no Musharraf,
a man (whether you love him or hate him), had been an officer
in the military since 1964 and who has experienced many
years of the blood, sweat and tears of combat experience.
We
should remember. That unlike any other Islamic country leader,
Musharraf issued an important speech against Islamic extremism
in 2002 and pledged to combat Islamic extremism within his
country. He also banned funding of madrasas and mosques
from outside of Pakistan (think Saudi Arabia!), and he mandated
modern sciences and computer technology be taught in Islamic
schools. In 2005, Musharraf spoke to the American Jewish
Congress, in New York where he denounced terrorism and opened
the door to relationships between Pakistan and Israel, as
well as between the Muslim world and Jews worldwide. This
brought criticism from other Islamic nations, but he didn't
back down nor change his promises.
A widely
popular Western ideal is that democracy is an end-goal and
that Islamic countries such as Pakistan can't live without
it. But just because Benazir Bhutto called for democracy,
does not necessarily mean she or the country was ready for
democracy. Nor did it mean she was qualified to help bring
it to fruition or even institute it, if it could ever be
achieved. Politics alone will not stop those that are well
trained and well armed. Politics cannot make a poor country
rich, nor stop a well trained and well armed religiously-based
fanatical militia. It should always be remembered, that
voting does not bring about democracy, it is democracy itself,
when stable and healthy, which brings about voting.
|
|